teedubbya wrote:The court disagreed.
Yes.
And no.
http://www.seattlepi.com/local/article/Judge-upholds-Gregoire-s-election-Rossi-won-t-1175262.php
"... required Rossi to show that Gregoire owed her victory to illegal votes. They also call for the litigants to identify specific illegal votes and by whom they were cast. And they say that if there's no sign of corruption by elections workers in handling an illegal vote that can't be assigned to one candidate or the other, that vote must be treated as valid."
In other words: they couldn't prove that specific votes were illegal.
Of course, a simple ID requirement would have helped immensely.
But that's an outrageous suggestion and obviously intended to disenfranchise liberal voters only.
(insert sarcasm here).