Sorry, I ain't buying it. I lived on more than one carribean island. With the exception of a few small retreats for the very wealthy, all carribean islands suffer from extreme class divisions and poverty. Remember their history: they were populated by indigenous people till the Europeans "discovered" them. Then soon after transformed into slave plantations for various western European naval powers. These places have deep seeded histories of violence and extreme social division known as patronism, and in its most extreme form, slavery.
Cuba was poor before Castro ever made his mark. The brutal Bautista regime ruled over a society of sugar cane cutters barely subsisting, as well as rich casino operators run by organized crime bosses from the US. There was no embargo on crime. The claim that Castro somehow impoverished that Island is absurd. He impoverished the rich land barons, and naturally they were pissed they had to offshore their fortunes. Since them, like him or not, Castro has tried to enact, and has had some success with social reform, in terms of providing health care and education to the underclass, who under Bautista were treated worse than animals.
Castro's record of human rights is abyssimal however, he has ruled with an iron fist, stamping out dissent with jail and/or executions.
Still, the simplistic all good or all bad tropes of the social reforms he attempted are just that; much of the island's misfortune comes from not being able to trade with the mighty America. Mexico or Canada too would be choked if we slapped an embargo on them.
Nevertheless, Castro allowed Soviet nukes in the 60s and sealed the island's fate.
That people are unable to discuss the rudimentary facts of history without immediate moral vertigo seems childish to me, like the need for Santa Claus.
Venezuela too can be seen in a similar light. That country has been controlled by a petroleum oligarchy, while the underclasses have gone neglected. A populist (Chavez) comes along, takes some of the gains of a very tiny elite, and redistributes it the poor; of course Jose & Juana peon are going to look with a little more respect on a ruler like that than they would at some Bush like character who only caters to the wealthy. It's just common sense to me, not that I expect anyone to agree. You got your opinion, I got mine
Claiming Castro invented poverty in Cuba is just rubbish however. It was there waiting for him with bells on when he took power.
Let the name calling resume.