America's #1 Online Cigar Auction
first, best, biggest!

Last post 6 years ago by frankj1. 533 replies replies.
11 Pages<123456789>»
Charlottesville VA
JadeRose Offline
#101 Posted:
Joined: 05-15-2008
Posts: 19,525
Mattie B wrote:
I'll call it what it is 8, yeah they are terrorist.

I don't believe it has anything to do with party lines either. Both sides have morons.....well they say they align with parties(or opposite party say they do)

Anyone who intentionally tries to put terror in people can be called terrorist.
Those morons that hold gruesome signs outside abortion clinics and scream....terrorist.
Black lives matter groups that beat folks and loot...terrorist.
Klan
Black Panthers
The list can go on and on

But this is a tiny amount of the US population. There will always be idiots.

I don't believe that people are born into hate. It's natural to trust. The wife and I taught 3rd grade Sunday School this morning. We had a visitor and his mother told us, he was painfully shy. Before the hour was over, he was having fun and even sat in my lap. Adults teach hate.

As for the monuments.
It's a shame that people can't get beyond the pain. I don't hate Sherman even though he torched the South. I'd have my photo taken in front of his statue and allow the wife to share it on social media. It's history.
I heard a woman say that a statue of Robert E Lee reminds southerners of how we wish slavery was still around....I had to change the channel. What an absolute idiot.

As for Jades comment on the South....it's just him trying to be funny. If he means it, I'd have to ask how much of the South he has visited? No offense taken

Terrorist may say they belong to something other than their hate group. Sound minds need to know they don't act like Americans and stop trying to find similarities with good people.






Yep.......Just giving you a hard time, Mattie. I've been all over the South. Tennessee and Kentucky, mostly but spent a lot of time in Georgia and both Carolina's. Beautiful places full of mostly very decent people. I was not particularly fond of S. Carolina but that's ok. I don't have to live there. This statement you made above is probably the best one made on this whole thread.
frankj1 Offline
#102 Posted:
Joined: 02-08-2007
Posts: 44,223
Mattie B wrote:
The Klan has been dead for decades.

And anyone with a brain in their head wouldn't be part of them.
They are vile and are lost.


One group that I can support is The Honor Guard. These are the guys that blocked protestors at military funerals. The anti-war groups try to shout and rally at the services of our fallen soldiers.

dead Mattie, or assimilated into mainstream...Dukes has won elections. Police departments and the military branches admit to infiltration.

Sheets and cross burning were the last two centuries. Make no mistake, these hate groups NEVER become extinct...that's why the saying Never Again is something to think about every day for me.

Not at you Mattie, but I'd like to add that these are the teachers of the type of hate this thread is really about...racial hate.
Not good vs evil, not Biblical lessons. Folks are obscuring what these pos's teach. No one is born with this type vile hatred toward others being discussed. This is not about being warlike, about survival of the fittest, or any other obfuscation brought up above.

Naziism is taught, KKK's ideals are taught. White race superiority is taught, and all these groups have their own versions of science and warped history to prove their despicable concepts.

They are expert at marketing and finding targets for recruiting supporters...much like fake religious cults know how to pick "lost" teenagers off the streets and at bus stations.

Mattie, this question IS for your post though...I am aware of Westboro being filthy at funerals of our military personnel, but I never thought of them as anti-war pacifists!
What groups are you talking about, my brother?
Mattie B Offline
#103 Posted:
Joined: 12-12-2005
Posts: 6,350
Frank,

My experience is merely second hand. I have a buddy that rides with The Honor Guard.

He described that they form a perimeter around the graveside service holding American flags. They are there to block the family from seeing the anti war signs protestors make.

I don't know what this group calls them self.


And I say the Klan is dead....there is no speaking of it. No prpoganda and no public knowledge of rallies. They exist underground if at all.
Whistlebritches Offline
#104 Posted:
Joined: 04-23-2006
Posts: 22,128
Mattie B wrote:
Frank,

My experience is merely second hand. I have a buddy that rides with The Honor Guard.

He described that they form a perimeter around the graveside service holding American flags. They are there to block the family from seeing the anti war signs protestors make.

I don't know what this group calls them self.


And I say the Klan is dead....there is no speaking of it. No prpoganda and no public knowledge of rallies. They exist underground if at all.


The KKK ,although in small numbers,is supported by the democrat party........always has been.Just pay them enough to keep the hate alive.
bgz Offline
#105 Posted:
Joined: 07-29-2014
Posts: 13,023
Actually frank, I would argue that it is survival of the fittest. People spread their BS because they believe it gives their future generations a better shot at survival... even if that BS was originally created by some slick talker to gain more power and money.

In no way am I defending these people for their beliefs, I'm merely making the claim and why racism/discrimination will never go away.

My social beliefs are inline with everyone here, racism bad, kkk bad, blm bad, etc...

Are our beliefs right or wrong? well, to me, they're right, but on a universal scale... I don't know. It could just be evolutionary switches to ensure war happens as a way for nature to ensure population control for all we know... I'm making no claim to that knowledge.

My only point is that humans are brutal AF and have been for a long time.

Anytime I see everyone pointing fingers as to who the bad guy is, makes me think of scarface...


What you lookin' at? You all a bunch of f**kin' a**holes. You know why? You don't have the guts to be what you wanna be? You need people like me. You need people like me so you can point your f**kin' fingers and say, "That's the bad guy." So... what that make you? Good? You're not good. You just know how to hide, how to lie. Me, I don't have that problem. Me, I always tell the truth. Even when I lie. So say good night to the bad guy! Come on. The last time you gonna see a bad guy like this again, let me tell you. Come on. Make way for the bad guy. There's a bad guy comin' through! Better get outta his way!
teedubbya Offline
#106 Posted:
Joined: 08-14-2003
Posts: 95,637
Wow. Just wow.
delta1 Offline
#107 Posted:
Joined: 11-23-2011
Posts: 28,807
Blame Trump. This is another of his failed promises. He boldly announced during his inauguration that the "carnage ends now!" As if...

Conservatives who tend to defend white nationalists have been outspoken about acts of violence during Resistance protests, mostly aimed at Trump supporters trying to obstruct a protest. Where is the outrage now? Neither side is immune to hateful and violent people on the margins, yet libs are painted as the anti-free speech, violent and destructive unhinged part of the American population among conservative circles.

But this event is an example of American greatness. We are able to let the most hateful among us gather and speak and try to defend them. We are able to let those who oppose their message gather and speak to denounce them. Our democracy and way of life was never threatened. We are still a land of laws and civility. At some point we can let every voice be heard without any person getting killed. But we are not too different from most other parts of the world. Racism and tribalism is alive and well.
JadeRose Offline
#108 Posted:
Joined: 05-15-2008
Posts: 19,525
frankj1 wrote:

Mattie, this question IS for your post though...I am aware of Westboro being filthy at funerals of our military personnel, but I never thought of them as anti-war pacifists!
What groups are you talking about, my brother?




The Westboro clowns are not that far away from me and I've seen and heard them enough to (unfortunately) know what they are all about. They are anti-homosexual for the most part. They march at the funerals of dead soldiers and claim that their deaths are a form of punishment to the nation for allowing the "abomination" of homosexuality to go on. The thing is....and what they are REALLY about...is that they are all lawyers. They sue at the drop of a hat. they sue if their civil rights get violated. They sue if they get assaulted. They sue for Libel, Slander, and Defamation of Character. They do a lot of very vile things. Things that WILL get their civil rights violated..things that WILL get them $hit-stomped. They do get slandered and Libeled. They sue. and, unfortunately, they win.


and sorry Mattie...I don't believe the KKK is dead. I know for a fact that there are chapters right here in Missouri. Normal, decent people don't hear that much about them because they are just that...normal, decent people. Evil is still very much alive, unfortunately.
JadeRose Offline
#109 Posted:
Joined: 05-15-2008
Posts: 19,525
8trackdisco wrote:

The only question left when the second american revolution happens, is whether it all be based on race or class.




I guess if I had to pick, it would be class. The ruling class needs to be booted. Old school, heads-on-pikes, type of stuff. Democrats, Republicans, all of them because they are all the same. None of them represent you or I. They divide us and conquer us without ever firing a shot. I'm not even talking about the Gubmint. I'm talking the REAL ruling class. The Kochs, the Soros's. Those shadowy figures that really make the decisions.
bgz Offline
#110 Posted:
Joined: 07-29-2014
Posts: 13,023
The ones to tell you who to point the finger at?
victor809 Offline
#111 Posted:
Joined: 10-14-2011
Posts: 23,866
Gotta say I am really disappointed in a lot of people. Not really surprised... but disappointed.

I really don't even know where to start.... Do we start with the people who have tried to put Black Lives Matter and the KKK in the same list? As if there is some sort of equivalence between a movement started for the simple reason that some people thought a disproportionate number of black people were killed in interactions with cops... and a group which was organized for the systematic brutal intimidation,, beating, raping and lynching of people of a specific race...

Then you have the confederate statues. Statues to people who were fighting for the specific reason to keep in place an organized subjugation of a race, a subjugation which had existed for generations and resulted in beatings, death, rapes of people for no reason other than being born a specific race. And the rationale is "we don't have a problem with the winning general's statues in our city... and he burned a bunch of people!".... it's an amazing inability to understand just how absolutely wrong one side of the war was. Hell.. you don't see people in germany bragging about their relatives fighting for the SS... or trying to keep statues of Himmler up. And while horrible people, and killing millions of people, they didn't even have the holocaust in place for a full generation. We are talking about an institution which killed millions of blacks just in the process of bringing slaves to the americas... and the ones that lived... well... they were slaves. To be beaten, raped or killed as desired. Yet there are people who romanticize the generals who wanted to fight to keep that institution in place. And feign surprise when someone who might have had their family history impacted by that institution aren't so thrilled to see a statue honoring those generals in place.

The claims that removing a statue to a general of the losing side is somehow "erasing history" is bullsh#t people are trying to sell who actually want to keep those statues in place out of some sick desire to have the country move back to that timeperiod. No one is suggesting removing the names from history books. In fact, I'd bet that the same people who want to remove those statues are very interested in ensuring our history books continue to document how half the country wanted to keep a race enslaved and were wiling to fight to the death to make sure they could. The confederate generals are not heroes of our country. They are heroes of a country which was quickly and appropriately aborted. There is no reason for us to keep those statues other than to appease racists.

As for the KKK... it doesn't need to be public any longer. Who needs sheets and hoods to mask their identity while they meet with other racists and talk racist sh3t... We have the internet where trolls can make up names for themselves to allow them to anonymously talk racist sh#t. We have right wing racists attacking people on twitter, or forums screaming threats of raping people in all CAPS when movie studios have a black man or a woman be a star in a movie,... I suppose we should be thankful that the internet is giving these sickos an outlet so they don't go burn a cross on a lawn ... But then one of them gets behind the wheel of a car.

The whole thing is disappointing. The idea that these "alt right" (read "racists without the balls to wear a sheet or a swastika") people exist in numbers to have a rally... the idea that anyone thinks there is a justification for them.... the fact that our president didn't denounce them immediately.... and on a personal note, a lot of the people here. All of it is disappointing.
bgz Offline
#112 Posted:
Joined: 07-29-2014
Posts: 13,023
victor809 wrote:


I really don't even know where to start.... Do we start with the people who have tried to put Black Lives Matter and the KKK in the same list? As if there is some sort of equivalence between a movement started for the simple reason that some people thought a disproportionate number of black people were killed in interactions with cops... and a group which was organized for the systematic brutal intimidation,, beating, raping and lynching of people of a specific race...



Racism is racism no matter the intention of the original message.

It takes work to overcome racism/classism/sexism and what ever the hell other isms that are out there, it just doesn't happen... like Delta said, it's the tribal mentality, us against them, black against white, north against south... red against blue.

What ever you want to call it, people naturally break up into groups based on common traits. I believe it's referred to as the herd mentality. You want to call it a travesty, and a disappointment that people do what pack animals do. I simply say, that's just how it is, and as far as our life spans go, probably how it will always be.

When comparing today's discriminatory groups to the past, It's still the same old sh17, just with different groups with different agendas in a world with different rules... the only thing that stays the same is the discrimination.

rfenst Offline
#113 Posted:
Joined: 06-23-2007
Posts: 39,345
Just curious... Did anyone have a protest permit?
JadeRose Offline
#114 Posted:
Joined: 05-15-2008
Posts: 19,525
rfenst wrote:
Just curious... Did anyone have a protest permit?




I believe they did, Robert. It was a planned rally.
DrafterX Offline
#115 Posted:
Joined: 10-18-2005
Posts: 98,559
So, the civil war was all about slavery now..?? I get confused... Huh
Mattie B Offline
#116 Posted:
Joined: 12-12-2005
Posts: 6,350
Drafter

Don't be confused. People that learned the 10,000 ft view of history would agree with your statement.



Jade,
I'll try to explain myself again. When I say the Klan is dead, I mean in comparison to decades past. I have no doubt there are still some that gather under the name.
TMCTLT Offline
#117 Posted:
Joined: 11-22-2007
Posts: 19,733
victor809 wrote:
Did tcby just criticize Obama for quoting Nelson Mandela?

What a f'ing moron.



So we agree that Barry is a Moron....that's cool!!! Beer
Mr. Jones Online
#118 Posted:
Joined: 06-12-2005
Posts: 19,433
I'm surprised that the person driving "the car"
Didn't go to MACCO FIRST AND GET THE
MONTHLY SPECIAL...

"DUKES OF HAZZARD CAR GENERAL LEE STYLE
PAINT JOB"

before plowing down,
Some Nazi's...
gummy jones Offline
#119 Posted:
Joined: 07-06-2015
Posts: 7,969
i have no expectation that everyone will love everyone
in fact, i am certain that it will never be achieved

some civility would be nice though
gummy jones Offline
#120 Posted:
Joined: 07-06-2015
Posts: 7,969
on a somewhat related note, who in the world keeps electing maxine waters...
ZRX1200 Offline
#121 Posted:
Joined: 07-08-2007
Posts: 60,626
Vic, if you think the civil war was about slavery then your as dumb as you think everyone here is.
victor809 Offline
#122 Posted:
Joined: 10-14-2011
Posts: 23,866
The civil war was about slavery. I'm also tired of people trying to rebrand it as something else. Sure there were other disagreements between the state's but if it was important enough that they felt the need to identify it front and center in the individual states declarations of war then it was abou t slavery. That's the excuse they were using for going to war. That's the idea they were rallying their troops and population around... don't try to sugar coat it and try to make it about something else.

It's f÷cking amazing that the same people who claim the other side is trying to rewrite history are trying to obfuscate history.
jjanecka Offline
#123 Posted:
Joined: 12-08-2015
Posts: 4,334
Yes victor slavery was the main focal point to an even larger issue which was whether or not the federal government had the authority to create blanket mandates.

Grant it, I have no ties to civil war America but I still say that the federal government needs to have limited power and the states should be able to choose what ia right for them individually.
rfenst Offline
#124 Posted:
Joined: 06-23-2007
Posts: 39,345
victor809 wrote:
The civil war was about slavery. I'm also tired of people trying to rebrand it as something else.


I don't agree. In high school, I took a class in Old South and Civil War. We were taught that the war was about economic means and diminution of the southern states' declining economic infrastructure (agriculture vs. industry economies, etc.) and political power relative to the north's. Lincoln didn't free the slaves until well into the war with the hope they'd fight for the north. That's not a criticism of Lincoln.
jjanecka Offline
#125 Posted:
Joined: 12-08-2015
Posts: 4,334
And at that it was only the Southern slaves that he freed. Those slaves in territories within the Union still remained slaves.
ZRX1200 Offline
#126 Posted:
Joined: 07-08-2007
Posts: 60,626
"My policy sought only to collect the Revenue (a 40 percent federal sales tax on imports to Southern States under the Morrill Tariff Act of 1861)." reads paragraph 5 of Lincoln's First Message to the U.S. Congress, penned July 4, 1861.

"I have no purpose, directly or in-directly, to interfere with the institution of slavery in the States where it exists. I believe I have no lawful right to do so, and I have no inclination to do so," Lincoln said it his first inaugural on March 4 of the same year.
ZRX1200 Offline
#127 Posted:
Joined: 07-08-2007
Posts: 60,626
When in the Course of Human Events: Arguing the Case for Southern Secession

The Real Lincoln

Some reading for you buddy.
TMCTLT Offline
#128 Posted:
Joined: 11-22-2007
Posts: 19,733
rfenst wrote:
I don't agree. In high school, I took a class in Old South and Civil War. We were taught that the war was about economic means and diminution of the southern states' declining economic infrastructure (agriculture vs. industry economies, etc.) and political power relative to the north's. Lincoln didn't free the slaves until well into the war with the hope they'd fight for the north. That's not a criticism of Lincoln.



As did I Robert...your spot on.
dstieger Offline
#129 Posted:
Joined: 06-22-2007
Posts: 10,889
So glad I spent the weekend fishing and didn't learn anything about this until this morning. Seems the news outlets have all gone way out of their way looking for outrage...and, in effect probably causing a lot of it.

Maybe I missed something by being unplugged...but from what I gather, a bunch of hate-filled white supremacists (who seem to be given zero validation by anyone outside their membership) had a planned gathering for no real reason other than to gather and see if they could gain more followers. (I really doubt that many of them cared much about any statues...but so what if they did. I think its ok for that to be a separate converstation.) A large contingent of people opposed to the group also gathered. Despite the reports that there were a LOT of weapons on hand, there was little more than shouting and scuffling between VERY different groups with a lot of hate to go around. Later, a likely mentally disturbed individual drove a car into a crowd. I can't seem to imagine that most of the worst of the supremacists thought very highly of that. The president condemned hatred, bigotry, violence.

All things considered...and with respects to the killed young woman and her family, I don't see what all the post-event noise is about. Yes...I read the comments above...and agree with a lot of it...but...really, all things considered, I don't think it was an event that I'm going to lose sleep over. Sure, the president could have said a lot of different things differently...and told people what they thought they wanted to hear...but Trump is who we're talking about here. I also agree that IN MY OPINION, he should have denounced the racists way back in the campaign when it was clear that they thought they were tacitly endorsed by him. He didn't....but I'm still a ways from blaming him for the idiots with the torches.

The one thing that I have learned...is that I should fish more and watch 'news' less...in fact maybe everyone should....but not where I'm fishing, please. Its crowded enough already.
victor809 Offline
#130 Posted:
Joined: 10-14-2011
Posts: 23,866
South Carolina declaration of secession has about 5 paragraphs complaining that the northern states are violating the 4th amendment by not returning their slaves.

Georgia... sentence #2: "For the last ten years we have had numerous and serious causes of complaint against our non-slave-holding confederate States with reference to the subject of African slavery. They have endeavored to weaken our security, to disturb our domestic peace and tranquility, and persistently refused to comply with their express constitutional obligations to us in reference to that property, and by the use of their power in the Federal Government have striven to deprive us of an equal enjoyment of the common Territories of the Republic"

Mississippi ... sentence #2: "Our position is thoroughly identified with the institution of slavery-- the greatest material interest of the world. Its labor supplies the product which constitutes by far the largest and most important portions of commerce of the earth. These products are peculiar to the climate verging on the tropical regions, and by an imperious law of nature, none but the black race can bear exposure to the tropical sun. These products have become necessities of the world, and a blow at slavery is a blow at commerce and civilization. "

Texas at least had the decency to bury the text a couple paragraphs down: "She was received as a commonwealth holding, maintaining and protecting the institution known as negro slavery-- the servitude of the African to the white race within her limits-- a relation that had existed from the first settlement of her wilderness by the white race, and which her people intended should exist in all future time. Her institutions and geographical position established the strongest ties between her and other slave-holding States of the confederacy. "

Virginia is the only one smart enough not to have mentioned it explicitly in their secession declaration.

This isn't rocket science guys. We're talking about slavery. There isn't a grey area. If they were fighting for their state right to kill jews whenever they wanted, and wrote that in to their secession declaration would you really be like "oh.. there were economic factors that really drove it"... the economic factor was they wanted free labor!!a Jesus

victor809 Offline
#131 Posted:
Joined: 10-14-2011
Posts: 23,866
Here's a quote from a delegate at the Virginia secession convention... guy named Henry Benning.
I'm not sure what I'm most disturbed by... the fact that people are trying to justify the generals who fought to support people like this sh1tstain, or the fact that I hear a lot of these same phrases from people today...

"What was the reason that induced Georgia to take the step of secession? This reason may be summed up in one single proposition. It was a conviction, a deep conviction on the part of Georgia, that a separation from the North-was the only thing that could prevent the abolition of her slavery. ... If things are allowed to go on as they are, it is certain that slavery is to be abolished. By the time the north shall have attained the power, the black race will be in a large majority, and then we will have black governors, black legislatures, black juries, black everything. Is it to be supposed that the white race will stand for that? It is not a supposable case ... war will break out everywhere like hidden fire from the earth, and it is probable that the white race, being superior in every respect, may push the other back. ... we will be overpowered and our men will be compelled to wander like vagabonds all over the earth; and as for our women, the horrors of their state we cannot contemplate in imagination. That is the fate which abolition will bring upon the white race. ... We will be completely exterminated, and the land will be left in the possession of the blacks, and then it will go back to a wilderness and become another Africa... Suppose they elevated Charles Sumner to the presidency? Suppose they elevated Fred Douglass, your escaped slave, to the presidency? What would be your position in such an event? I say give me pestilence and famine sooner than that."

Seriously... I've heard the same sh1t in this forum from people... whether it's Muslims in Detroit "they're creating a caliphate!!" Or people afraid whites will become the minority....

Disgusting fear and short sightedness....
opelmanta1900 Offline
#132 Posted:
Joined: 01-10-2012
Posts: 13,954
way too many "...." in the paragraph above... and that's coming from me...

I do like the lack of shame that guy had while basically saying "listen, I've been treating black people like sh*t for a long time and if they suddenly get free they're gonna come looking for me, so we gotta make sure they don't get freed as long as I'm alive cuz seriously, they're gonna r*pe my wife and daughters and possibly me cuz, like I said, I've been treating black people like sh*t for a really long time."
victor809 Offline
#133 Posted:
Joined: 10-14-2011
Posts: 23,866
They're very interesting quotes. I find them fascinating given the claim everyone likes to make to pretend slavery had nothing to do with it or was just a tiny part of it.

Those are the documents they drafted for posterity. That's what they wanted people to read and say "yeah you made the right decision"... how good could the reasons they didn't want us to know about be if they were leading with "I like slavery"
teedubbya Offline
#134 Posted:
Joined: 08-14-2003
Posts: 95,637
The civil war was not completely about slavery and was about states rights and economics that is true. However Slavery was a big part of the states rights and economics arguments. The flash point for the war grew out of the Missouri Compromise and the subsequent Kansas/Nebraska act. Sprinkle in the Jay Hawkers, Cantrail and the dual governments in Kansas (the false one was recognized by the feds) and you can pretty easily understand the run up to the war. And while freeing the slaves was not the primary reason for the war, slavery was an integral component in nearly every part of the conflict.

The war was not to "free the slaves". That came later. But when you talk states rights, it was primarily for states to be able to determine to be free states or slave states (vs the previous no new slave states) on their own without fed oppression in the decision, followed by shenanigans from slave states trying to illegally influence new states decisions. Saying the war was not to free the slaves is very different than saying the war was not about slavery.

and yes there were other complicating factors.
RobertHively Offline
#135 Posted:
Joined: 01-14-2015
Posts: 1,870
dstieger wrote:


The one thing that I have learned...is that I should fish more and watch 'news' less...in fact maybe everyone should....but not where I'm fishing, please. Its crowded enough already.


Way ahead of you. I bass fish and hike all of the time and refuse to pay for cable. The media are the worlds best trolls, and they love to get everyone riled up...aint happening in my house. F'em.
ZRX1200 Offline
#136 Posted:
Joined: 07-08-2007
Posts: 60,626
Teedubya I'd agree with you.
DrafterX Offline
#137 Posted:
Joined: 10-18-2005
Posts: 98,559
Think
So, the civil war was caused by shenanigans..?? Huh
teedubbya Offline
#138 Posted:
Joined: 08-14-2003
Posts: 95,637
DrafterX wrote:
Think
So, the civil war was caused by shenanigans..?? Huh



Yes. As a matter of fact Lincoln wanted to call it the shenanigans war but when he consulted with Ben Franklin, Ben told him that wouldn't be civil.





I get amused at the fake press claims as if it's something new. I mentioned William Randolph Hurst as an example of this crap happening a long time ago and someone argued with me about it. Want another example? The press manipulated the hell out of the "sacking of Lawrence" contemporary press had it as a nasty siege and burning to the ground sort of thing. The more I read it sounds like it is somewhere between a shouting match and blitzkrieg. Control the narrative is nothing new.

Bleeding Kansas is a good book to start with if you want to understand the lead up to the war.

There was a pretty cool show on AHC this morning called Titans. This one was about Hurst and Pulitzer. I never realized Pulitzers involvement in the time. The show was somewhat disappointing because it finished short of Hurst leveraging his papers etc for political gain. It did hit on the cuban stuff and creating news rather than reporting it though. That stuff fascinates me.
DrafterX Offline
#139 Posted:
Joined: 10-18-2005
Posts: 98,559
Ben was smart... I heard he invented peanut butter... I wonder if he knew it would kill peoples... Mellow
teedubbya Offline
#140 Posted:
Joined: 08-14-2003
Posts: 95,637
DrafterX wrote:
Ben was smart... I heard he invented peanut butter... I wonder if he knew it would kill peoples... Mellow



Ben was smart. Too bad he was dead before Columbus discovered aluminum foil.
DrafterX Offline
#141 Posted:
Joined: 10-18-2005
Posts: 98,559
And sliced bread.. not sure when the north Koreans invented jelly tho... Mellow
teedubbya Offline
#142 Posted:
Joined: 08-14-2003
Posts: 95,637
DrafterX wrote:
And sliced bread.. not sure when the north Koreans invented jelly tho... Mellow



Not long before eli whitney invented the kegerator.
delta1 Offline
#143 Posted:
Joined: 11-23-2011
Posts: 28,807
The raison d'etre for the KKK, White Nationalists and affiliated white supremacy groups is: the white race is superior to all others, the white race must be kept pure, and America was founded by white Europeans so all others should be excluded. American history is replete with believers of this philosophy: some of our greatest citizens were ardent believers. This philosophy was codified in local, state and federal laws until the 60's and some vestiges remain. To this day, many influential and powerful American elites who grew up when that was the law of the land, believe this. A look at the composition of major corporate boards and top administrations of the biggest and wealthiest American corporations and leaders at all levels of government reflect this belief.

With such a strong and firm grip on the levers of American power, money and influence, why do some members of the majority race (and by a large margin) need to hate, fear and denigrate minority people?


It's almost like in-your-face taunting...life doesn't have to be a win-lose game...the human race has been made better by those from all parts of the globe seeking win-win solutions...
delta1 Offline
#144 Posted:
Joined: 11-23-2011
Posts: 28,807
The raison d'etre for the KKK, White Nationalists and affiliated white supremacy groups is: the white race is superior to all others, the white race must be kept pure, and America was founded by white Europeans so all others should be excluded. American history is replete with believers of this philosophy: some of our greatest citizens were ardent believers. This philosophy was codified in local, state and federal laws until the 60's and some vestiges remain. To this day, many influential and powerful American elites who grew up when that was the law of the land, believe this. A look at the composition of major corporate boards and top administrations of the biggest and wealthiest American corporations and leaders at all levels of government reflect this belief.

With such a strong and firm grip on the levers of American power, money and influence, why do some members of the majority race (and by a large margin) need to hate, fear and denigrate minority people?


It's almost like in-your-face taunting...life doesn't have to be a win-lose game...the human race has been made better by those from all parts of the globe seeking win-win solutions...


(Is it because we knucklehead minorities keep double posting???...smh)
opelmanta1900 Offline
#145 Posted:
Joined: 01-10-2012
Posts: 13,954
teedubbya wrote:


Bleeding Kansas is a good book to start with if you want to understand the lead up to the war.

s'at that book they give girls when they's becomin wimmin?
delta1 Offline
#146 Posted:
Joined: 11-23-2011
Posts: 28,807
I think it was given the day before their wedding...
bgz Offline
#147 Posted:
Joined: 07-29-2014
Posts: 13,023
I don't think it's possible to be 100% white. I've seen the results from several people who've had their DNA tested, you'd be surprised at the results. I mean, what specific nationalities can be designated as white? There's plenty of Caucasians from warmer climates who are quite dark for being "white".

Further, I would think everyone would have a certain percentage of African lineage even if it's a very small percentage just due to the leading theories of where the first humans were born.

I think the KKK should install protocol for making all it's members take a DNA test to prove they are 100% (99.999 minimum) white to be members to ensure purity continues on... problem solved.
delta1 Offline
#148 Posted:
Joined: 11-23-2011
Posts: 28,807
Back when eugenics was a goal, before DNA, that was the objective...I dunno, but the current believers prolly don't care too much about the science...just the rhetoric...didja ever see the Dave Chappelle bit about the blind Grand Dragon of the KKK?...hilarious...
jjanecka Offline
#149 Posted:
Joined: 12-08-2015
Posts: 4,334
I think BGZ is the grand authoritarian or whatever they call it.
ZRX1200 Offline
#150 Posted:
Joined: 07-08-2007
Posts: 60,626
https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=6tPs78ofDPo
Users browsing this topic
Guest
11 Pages<123456789>»