Joined: 11-02-2006 Posts: 121,359
|
Bad enough that the interface is busy and cluttered just to be busy and cluttered, everything takes four times more clicks now to perform, the overall sluggish performance times on top of that are making this site painful to use. Screw the forum, if you don't fix that, you're going to lose customers. Also interesting is how this is being touted as some wonderful advancement, yet, in the last 24 or 48 hours since the changeover, features are being steadily removed instead of added. For regular view - If we're going to be stuck with this cluttered, eclectic and busy just to be busy interface, might as well at least get a decent featureset rather than the amateurish and electric set now offered.
- An option in the user CP (preferences) to set the number of posts viewable per page. Say 5 choices: 10, 20, 30, 40, 50 and ALL posts per page to pick from. Although more than 50 is probably too cumbersome for the new graphical format that has been adopted.
- Embedded hyperlinks? Opens up a can of worms for competitor links, spam and malicious links, but can be convenient when used properly and as intended. Please make it clear if they are going to be added or they are out of the question.
- Polls. Might as well add polls, otherwise some people will never be able to figure out what to smoke or buy. Limiting to maximum of 10 choices is usually sufficient. Rarely will there ever be a need for more choices.
- Time limits on edits - no need to have things changeable forever. 15 minutes is usually sufficient. A proper edit function should also track and make
available what was edited in addition to showing the time and date of the edit.
- Ranks are pointless and worthless in most cases other than for identifying Administrator, Moderator and Vendor/Sponsor, or in this forum, Manufacturer. If you're going to have them, you might as well make them editable by the user, let them have some fun with them.
- Search by thread title
- IMG code? Looks like Gonz or one of his people turned off the tag now? yes/no?
- If you're going to have quoting, might as well have a multi-quote function.
- A properly implemented list function. This should be showing as a numbered list, yet all it's doing is a tab spacing the items. Unordered lists come out the same as they lack bullets.
The classic view needs a lot of help.
- Delineation between posts is insufficient (bars are too thin) and the server dictated font and size make it difficult to increase legibility.
- Also, if someone is viewing in classic mode, then it stands to reason that they probably just want a quick reply box to enter text into and not the advanced composition window with all the feature controls and emoticons. Have the "reply" link at the far right of each author bar open in quick reply rather than advanced composition. Add a "Go to Advanced Composition" button at the bottom of the quick reply window so that they can use that if they want to go advanced.
- Consider adding a "quote" module to the left of the reply in classic mode.
- A classic view for the threads index would also be appropriate.
More later if the site works long enough to manage a post...
|