teedubbya wrote:Tail I assume you are being serious and genuine so I’ll respond. I don’t intend to get in to a compartmentalized point for point in an attempt to justify the absurd.
You just repeated parts of the theory. It’s the use of partial truths and convenient extrapolation.
Biden did brag about “it”. But the it isn’t what you describe. The whole world wanted the prosecutor out at the time. They thought he was corrupt. It was out in the open, not behind closed doors and never a secret. And while Biden may brag about his role it was also not his decision. Add to that the claim the prosecutor was investigating Bidens son at the time, which appears to be untrue or at least nothing supports that claim.
It was in the open, has been investigated, and the facts are being twisted. It’s similar to the Hillary uranium conspiracy theory and is only there if you want it to be.
That aside; if you think it needs more investigation (again) knock yourself out. He can refer it to DOJ and several other mechanisms (many of which have already debunked it which may be why a bogus route is preferred).
In this case legitimate routes of investigation are being shunned and even blocked by those in power and the accusation is instead he is going to another country to pursue his theory.
Come on man. Don’t get caught up in this one. It’s laughable.
It would satiate my curiosity if someone were to explain Hunter Biden's role.
The Obama administration claims no conflict because he was a private citizen.
Read: It's just a coincidence that the VP's son was hired to a job in the Ukraine during daddy's tenure.
The prosecutor in question was investigating the company Hunter worked for. I don't think this is in question.
The Obama adminstration said "nothing to see here".
Read: coincidence that Hunter Biden gets suddenly rich while the company he's on the board for is working deals with the US VP (aka Daddy).
You're right. There isn't firm proof.
But I find it difficult to believe the left's interpretation.
This was cronyism 101 and it was swept under the rug.
I honestly think it's naive to believe otherwise.
Is it a big deal in the scheme of things? Probably not. We're not beholden to anyone.
But neither would we be if all the Trump allegations are true. If true, this was a power play by Trump. One that may have brought him on the wrong side of what's legal. But no more nefarious than what happened under the last regime.
What concerns me most is the sudden interest by the media.
Because you're right. We DID know about Biden's questionable dealings. Approved by Obama. And just a collective shoulder shrug by the media for essentially the same thing.