gryphonms wrote:TG, now I think I understand your point so I will try to better state my point.
After reading HD's point about water vapor I read an article from NASA that explained that atmospheric water vapor is a cause of global warming. It also stated that increasing atmospheric carbon dioxide increases atmospheric water vapor. Global warming is far to complex of an issue to state that it is man made. But I find it reasonable to say part of global warming could be man made. Also due to the complexity of global warming it is unrealistic to state that it is harmful. But I find it reasonable to say that global warming could be harmful.
I would like to the atmospheric water vapor trend reversed, stopped, or slowed. I do not know which of these is realistically possible. My reasoning for this is that due to the possibility of global warming being harmful I think it is worthwhile to reverse, stop, or slow global warming. Again I do not know what is realisticly possible.
I think an obvious way to do this is to reverse, stop, or slow atmospheric carbon dioxide. Again, I do not know what is realisticly possible.
Excellent post.
I highlighted the problem. although you admit it may not be "possible", that's not the issue. The issue is whether it would have any measurable effect.
Obama, algore, and the legion of minions have decided that it DOES have an impact. They formulate taxes and fees and laws and mandates penalties based on their assumptions. Assumptions that even NASA has determined are inaccurate at best.
If the only thing you ever knew about climate change came from that NASA article, you would dismiss CO2 as negligible. Now, ask yourself why you are giving it so much weight.