America's #1 Online Cigar Auction
first, best, biggest!

Last post 6 years ago by DrafterX. 682 replies replies.
14 Pages«<456789101112>»
National Firearms Act (NFA) of 1934
HuckFinn Offline
#351 Posted:
Joined: 07-10-2017
Posts: 2,044
DrafterX wrote:
Remember when Obama promised to pay for people in da ghetto's mortgage then never did... Mellow

He was tapped out after the food stamps thing.
DrafterX Offline
#352 Posted:
Joined: 10-18-2005
Posts: 98,552
He did extend unemployment payments thru his first term to secure votes tho... Mellow
victor809 Offline
#353 Posted:
Joined: 10-14-2011
Posts: 23,866
tailgater wrote:
Race relations got worse.

Even if I give you the hopeless "it can't be done, woe is me" argument, it shouldn't get worse.

Lead by example.

Demand more, not less from people.

Expect responsibility.

Stop rewarding complacency.


So... there's a couple problems with your statements.
Why do you think race relations got worse?
I think this is a very real question which has to be properly answered, because a lot of people on the trump side of conservative blame obama for race relations being worse....
Oddly, this is the same group which started throwing a fit almost the instant obama was elected.

So there's a fun slight of hand there.... black man gets elected president... then a group starts claiming reverse racism about every thing he does.... that same group then points to their own howling complaints as evidence that race relations are worse.... as a coup-de-grace... that same group then organizes white nationalist parades for the new incoming president.

Anyway.... I don't honestly think race relations are truly worse.
I think there is a lot more visibility to the problems which existed, and that creates a perception that its worse.
An easy example would be the ubiquity of cell phones. Those now allow black people to post evidence whenever they feel like they are being mistreated by police. That ubiquity of cell phones essentially allowed the existence of a black lives matter movement. That's not because police started treating black people bad in the year 2010... it's because suddenly they could show people outside of their community what they saw. Relations between black people and cops didn't get worse. They just became visible.


I think a lot of what we see with race relations now has to do with visibility and communication. Previously, racist dudes had to put on hoods and masks and have secret meetings to not let people know they were the racist dude. Now they just give themselves an anonymous username on a cigar forum, or 4chan, or 8chan, or discord... They can organize, they can reinforce each other's beliefs. And on the other side, the very far left liberals can do the same thing... they come up with new things they consider micro-aggressions, and reinforce in their own mind how bad that is. Then, they post that sh#t to facebook, and everyone reads about how racist people are, and the racists then just claim they aren't racist but the PC crowd keeps moving the bar and makes it just darn impossible for them to not say anything nice about the darkies. We see people's racist thoughts because after they've tossed the dumb racist ideas back and forth with their fellow anonymous racists on cigarbid, or 8chan, the idea seems suddenly normal and ok to them. So they post their racist meme to facebook or twitter, and are suddenly surprised when half their friends tell them it's racist. They get defensive, and use any number of defensive techniques to claim they aren't racist, they have a black friend, or whatever... but we all see it. It's visible.

I dunno. Maybe that can be considered worse. Maybe the people who are marginal racists are becoming full-blown racists due to their constant reinforcing of racist ideas in these siloed internet forums. But even if that's the case, it isn't due to obama.

A quick sanity check could easily show that all this insane racist crap started popping up the instant Obama became president. Not before he proved himself one way or another.... so he didn't make race relations worse... if anything, the election of a black president drove some people so crazy they showed the world how racist they were.

Meh... I'm rambling now.
Speyside Offline
#354 Posted:
Joined: 03-16-2015
Posts: 13,106
People hated Obama because he is black, man that's so shocking. It couldn't happen in America, wait um never mind it did. Shouldn't someone point out that Hillary is the real problem. Benghazi, Benghazi, look a squirrel! I mean won't our solid citizens tell you how wrong you are? Again that happens daily, my bad. But Trump will make it right because you know there are good people on both sides. I am sure you have see many of those good people white supremacists. Um repetitive, never mind that's an oxymoron.
paulkeck Offline
#355 Posted:
Joined: 02-24-2013
Posts: 2,686
Speyside wrote:
People hated Obama because he is black, man that's so shocking. It couldn't happen in America, wait um never mind it did. Shouldn't someone point out that Hillary is the real problem. Benghazi, Benghazi, look a squirrel! I mean won't our solid citizens tell you how wrong you are? Again that happens daily, my bad. But Trump will make it right because you know there are good people on both sides. I am sure you have see many of those good people white supremacists. Um repetitive, never mind that's an oxymoron.


Yep and poor Trump is hated because he is white...
banderl Offline
#356 Posted:
Joined: 09-09-2008
Posts: 10,153
paulkeck wrote:
Yep and poor Trump is hated because he is white...



No, people hate the pumpkin colored a-hole because he's a pumpkin colored a-hole.
paulkeck Offline
#357 Posted:
Joined: 02-24-2013
Posts: 2,686
banderl wrote:
No, people hate the pumpkin colored a-hole because he's a pumpkin colored a-hole.

Soooo you're a racist as well???
banderl Offline
#358 Posted:
Joined: 09-09-2008
Posts: 10,153
paulkeck wrote:
Soooo you're a racist as well???



Yep, I hate pumpkin colored a-holes.
paulkeck Offline
#359 Posted:
Joined: 02-24-2013
Posts: 2,686
banderl wrote:
Yep, I hate pumpkin colored a-holes.

That is just horrible! I mean hate is hate...pumpkins have feelings also
tailgater Offline
#360 Posted:
Joined: 06-01-2000
Posts: 26,185
Newsflash to the liberals (and victor69):
Partisan opinion means that conservatives DID dislike Obama. Because (get ready for it) he was a liberal!

The fact that you'all drag race into it is a fuqing joke and speaks much more of yourself.

I didn't vote for Obama.
But I remember his inauguration.
I hated the narrative: first black president, blah blah.
Why make the moment less important by assigning a skin color litmus test?

But man...
To see the first person of color take the oath.
It was awesome. I was wrong. It was monumental.

And I'm guilty of thinking that America could FINALLY put so much behind her.
How many "racist" countries freely elect a black man?
Rhetorical.
But here we are 10 years later and people still mewl over "white guilt".
BLM is a national thing.
Historical Flags hurt feelings.
Disagree with a liberal black man and it must be because of his skin color.
If you hand out a shovel instead of food stamps it means you hate minorities.
Move to the Colorado Mountains to avoid sickle cell and you get labeled.
Just kidding on that last one.

I stand by what I said. After 8 years of Obama, this nation has a bigger race problem than when he started.




RMAN4443 Offline
#361 Posted:
Joined: 09-29-2016
Posts: 7,683
^^^^^^Word
DrafterX Offline
#362 Posted:
Joined: 10-18-2005
Posts: 98,552
Victor keeps mentioning a 'group'... Do they have a name..?? Who are da members..?? Huh
tailgater Offline
#363 Posted:
Joined: 06-01-2000
Posts: 26,185
victor809 wrote:


A quick sanity check could easily show that all this insane racist crap started popping up the instant Obama became president. Not before he proved himself one way or another.... so he didn't make race relations worse... if anything, the election of a black president drove some people so crazy they showed the world how racist they were.




You just described the Trump presidency and his detractors to a tee.
The anti-Trump rhetoric started instantly.
Hell, the snowflakes had to take a day off because of the election results!
Rallies were formed and people were marching before he took his oath.

You have repeatedly professed that the anti Obama feelings were rooted in racism.
What do you attribute the anti-Trump reaction?

And don't be so bold as to suggest it's thoughtful recognition or intelligent foresight.
It wasn't.
It's simple partisan politics.

At least I'm honest about that.
Too many anti-Trumpers don't have that capacity.

Phil222 Offline
#364 Posted:
Joined: 10-01-2017
Posts: 1,911
I dislike Obama because he ran on "Change" and bailing out Main Street, and then he bailed out Wall Street and made the Bush 1%er tax cuts permanant. He increased governmental spying powers. He took us from two wars to like seven, bombing and killing who knows how many hundreds of thousands in Middle East. He gave us a right-wing healthcare plan which the right used to destroy Democrats with in the 2016 election. Anyways, I could keep going.

He did do some good things, but more bad than good in my opinion. Me disliking him has nothing to do with skin color. He was not "Change." He was more of the same, just like Trump.
Brewha Offline
#365 Posted:
Joined: 01-25-2010
Posts: 12,182
OMG, Donald Trump is moving to ban bump stocks.

Never mind that this appears to be a safe move because there is no big money behind bump stock manufacturing. I can’t believe the NRA is letting him do it!
Phil222 Offline
#366 Posted:
Joined: 10-01-2017
Posts: 1,911
Out of the 15+ thousand people killed by guns in 2017, I wonder how many of those were by people using bump stocks?

I feel safer already...Cool
HuckFinn Offline
#367 Posted:
Joined: 07-10-2017
Posts: 2,044
tailgater wrote:
Newsflash to the liberals (and victor69):
Partisan opinion means that conservatives DID dislike Obama. Because (get ready for it) he was a liberal!

The fact that you'all drag race into it is a fuqing joke and speaks much more of yourself.

I didn't vote for Obama.
But I remember his inauguration.
I hated the narrative: first black president, blah blah.
Why make the moment less important by assigning a skin color litmus test?

But man...
To see the first person of color take the oath.
It was awesome. I was wrong. It was monumental.

And I'm guilty of thinking that America could FINALLY put so much behind her.
How many "racist" countries freely elect a black man?
Rhetorical.
But here we are 10 years later and people still mewl over "white guilt".
BLM is a national thing.
Historical Flags hurt feelings.
Disagree with a liberal black man and it must be because of his skin color.
If you hand out a shovel instead of food stamps it means you hate minorities.
Move to the Colorado Mountains to avoid sickle cell and you get labeled.
Just kidding on that last one.

I stand by what I said. After 8 years of Obama, this nation has a bigger race problem than when he started.





That Obama was a liberal, and a really ambitious/aggressive one to boot was, of course, a legitimate reason for conservatives to fear and hate him and his politics. That's partisanship and faIr.
But it's clear that many openly and closeted racists hated him because of his color. Not sure how you can defend against that reality...

I also was hopeful and proud when he was elected. Still am actually. And not because of his politics, but because of what it said about us.
teedubbya Offline
#368 Posted:
Joined: 08-14-2003
Posts: 95,637
Phil222 wrote:
Out of the 15+ thousand people killed by guns in 2017, I wonder how many of those were by people using bump stocks?

I feel safer already...Cool



That was my initial reaction as well. My first thought is it is a relatively small throw away to divert and prevent more substantive action. Then I moved to isn't it funny he is moving towards doing it by fiat through Sessions which is exactly what he bagged Obama for doing. Then I moved to WTF is wrong with me. It's at least something and give credit where credit is due. I don't know the answer to the problem, but it's hard to be critical even if it is a baby step.
Brewha Offline
#369 Posted:
Joined: 01-25-2010
Posts: 12,182
OMG, I realized the obvious – This is only Trumps FIRST STEP to taking ALL our WEAPONS.
Even the ones that don’t work.

Soon they will be kicking down our doors to search for guns, rifles, knives,,,,
We will all be left with only plastic sporks……
Phil222 Offline
#370 Posted:
Joined: 10-01-2017
Posts: 1,911
teedubbya wrote:
That was my initial reaction as well. My first thought is it is a relatively small throw away to divert and prevent more substantive action. Then I moved to isn't it funny he is moving towards doing it by fiat through Sessions which is exactly what he bagged Obama for doing. Then I moved to WTF is wrong with me. It's at least something and give credit where credit is due. I don't know the answer to the problem, but it's hard to be critical even if it is a baby step.


I don't have the answers either, but I can say with almost 100% certainty that a ban on bump stocks is not gonna do much. Some have stated in this thread what I think to be pretty good ideas moving forward.

Things like looking at why people are commiting crimes and gun violence in the first place and trying to solve those issues, providing better access to things like mental healthcare, especially for our youth. You even mentioned letting the cdc and nih study gun violence which I think would be a very good first step, but instead we get a bump stock ban. Maybe this is just the first baby step to measures that will have a greater impact. I hope so.
Brewha Offline
#371 Posted:
Joined: 01-25-2010
Posts: 12,182
Phil222 wrote:


Things like looking at why people are commiting crimes and gun violence in the first place and trying to solve those issues, providing better access to things like mental healthcare, especially for our youth. You even mentioned letting the cdc and nih study gun violence which I think would be a very good first step, but instead we get a bump stock ban. Maybe this is just the first baby step to measures that will have a greater impact. I hope so.


Phil, Are you suggesting that we have some communist healthcare system - like Obamacare?
Any red blooded Republican will tell you that if people need mental healthcare, then they need to get a job and pay for it. Especially the children.
HuckFinn Offline
#372 Posted:
Joined: 07-10-2017
Posts: 2,044
tailgater wrote:
You just described the Trump presidency and his detractors to a tee.
The anti-Trump rhetoric started instantly.

What do you attribute the anti-Trump reaction?

It's simple partisan politics.



Seriously? I disagree. Trump's behavior even character before and during his campaign was always abhorrent to me.
And his party affiliation, politics? Always ambiguous.
In 2001 he was a Democratic, 2009 a Republican, 2011 a "no party affiliation" ...

While campaigning he found a message and a base: a white, angry, xenophobic base that inspired him to spew build a wall, lock her up, make America great again and apparently whatever catchy slogans that would and did captivate them. Still ain't politics. That's taking temperature.
He proceeded to demonized Obama and promise to reverse as many plans and treaties of Obama's that he could. He guaranteed it, by golly.

I dunno, none of any of that looked anything like a politics to me. It was more like side show barking at the Barnum and Bailey Circus.

I was and remain anti-Trump not so much based on his politics.
Partly because they seem to change from day to day.
For me it's a matter of character. Not politics.
Well, maybe a little politics...he's impulsive and not all that bright imo.
teedubbya Offline
#373 Posted:
Joined: 08-14-2003
Posts: 95,637
i don't consider Trump a Republican even though he used the party as his avenue to the presidency. I would have voted for all Republicans other than Trump or Cruz.
paulkeck Offline
#374 Posted:
Joined: 02-24-2013
Posts: 2,686
teedubbya wrote:
i don't consider Trump a Republican even though he used the party as his avenue to the presidency. I would have voted for all Republicans other than Trump or Cruz.


Hell I would have voted for uncle Rico before I voted for Hilkary
victor809 Offline
#375 Posted:
Joined: 10-14-2011
Posts: 23,866
tailgater wrote:
Newsflash to the liberals (and victor69):
Partisan opinion means that conservatives DID dislike Obama. Because (get ready for it) he was a liberal!

The fact that you'all drag race into it is a fuqing joke and speaks much more of yourself.

Sure. Plenty of people disliked obama because he was going to screw with the healthcare system in place currently, or do other liberal things. That's not what I'm talking about.
I'm talking about the muslim references, the monkey photos/drawings, the "kenyan king" references, the birther crap, and a huge number of other things which popped up which had absolutely nothing to do with his politics, had nothing to do with a single outrageous thing he did or said prior to the election, yet immediately became a reason to attack him.

That crap had nothing to do with politics or him as a person. It was purely based on his race, his name, the fact he was "different" to people.


Quote:

How many "racist" countries freely elect a black man?
Rhetorical.
But here we are 10 years later and people still mewl over "white guilt".
BLM is a national thing.
Historical Flags hurt feelings.
Disagree with a liberal black man and it must be because of his skin color.
If you hand out a shovel instead of food stamps it means you hate minorities.
Move to the Colorado Mountains to avoid sickle cell and you get labeled.
Just kidding on that last one.

I stand by what I said. After 8 years of Obama, this nation has a bigger race problem than when he started.


Yeah, you're mixing too much crap in there to parse out.
victor809 Offline
#376 Posted:
Joined: 10-14-2011
Posts: 23,866
tailgater wrote:
You just described the Trump presidency and his detractors to a tee.
The anti-Trump rhetoric started instantly.
Hell, the snowflakes had to take a day off because of the election results!
Rallies were formed and people were marching before he took his oath.

You have repeatedly professed that the anti Obama feelings were rooted in racism.
What do you attribute the anti-Trump reaction?

And don't be so bold as to suggest it's thoughtful recognition or intelligent foresight.
It wasn't.
It's simple partisan politics.

At least I'm honest about that.
Too many anti-Trumpers don't have that capacity.



Attacks on trump have been based on his character.
He liked sexually assaulting women well before he was elected. Do you expect people who dislike sexual assault to sort of put that aside for a year or so and wait to see if he does a good job as a president? I'm pretty sure if you're anti-sexual assault you're gonna hate him from the point where he brags about it forward.

He liked telling people in his crowd to attack journalists or protesters during his campaign...
On his inauguration day he started lying about crowd size... crowd size. Seriously, from day 1 of his presidency he started with childish lies and pretending the media is lying about him. (attacking the media again).

Even someone who decided to push reset on all the horrible character flaws he demonstrated in the campaign, to give him a fresh chance on election... Day one he started with mewling whiny lies about his crowd size.
paulkeck Offline
#377 Posted:
Joined: 02-24-2013
Posts: 2,686
victor809 wrote:
Sure. Plenty of people disliked obama because he was going to screw with the healthcare system in place currently, or do other liberal things. That's not what I'm talking about.
I'm talking about the muslim references, the monkey photos/drawings, the "kenyan king" references, the birther crap, and a huge number of other things which popped up which had absolutely nothing to do with his politics, had nothing to do with a single outrageous thing he did or said prior to the election, yet immediately became a reason to attack him.

That crap had nothing to do with politics or him as a person. It was purely based on his race, his name, the fact he was "different" to people.



Yeah, you're mixing too much crap in there to parse out.


Thank God!!! Sheesh I mean you type very well but by the 5th paragraph I'm like just shut tha f$%k up already!!!
HuckFinn Offline
#378 Posted:
Joined: 07-10-2017
Posts: 2,044
paulkeck wrote:
[/h][/h]

Thank God!!! Sheesh I mean you type very well but by the 5th paragraph I'm like just shut tha f$%k up already!!!

And yet you haven't been able to refute a single thing he's said.

So he's not a one-liner punchline poster.
Invalidate a single observation he's made about Obama or trump.
paulkeck Offline
#379 Posted:
Joined: 02-24-2013
Posts: 2,686
HuckFinn wrote:
And yet you haven't been able to refute a single thing he's said.

So he's not a one-liner punchline poster.
Invalidate a single observation he's made about Obama or trump.

I would have to read the entire post your boyfriend posts!! Ain't nobody got time for that!!
paulkeck Offline
#380 Posted:
Joined: 02-24-2013
Posts: 2,686
HuckFinn wrote:
And yet you haven't been able to refute a single thing he's said.

So he's not a one-liner punchline poster.
Invalidate a single observation he's made about Obama or trump.


But that was cute and all!! Knight in shining armor! Lol
teedubbya Offline
#381 Posted:
Joined: 08-14-2003
Posts: 95,637
well that was substantive. I know it has me thinking.
tailgater Offline
#382 Posted:
Joined: 06-01-2000
Posts: 26,185
HuckFinn wrote:
That Obama was a liberal, and a really ambitious/aggressive one to boot was, of course, a legitimate reason for conservatives to fear and hate him and his politics. That's partisanship and faIr.
But it's clear that many openly and closeted racists hated him because of his color. Not sure how you can defend against that reality...

I also was hopeful and proud when he was elected. Still am actually. And not because of his politics, but because of what it said about us.



No schit sherlock.

And the sky is blue.



tailgater Offline
#383 Posted:
Joined: 06-01-2000
Posts: 26,185
victor809 wrote:
Attacks on trump have been based on his character.
He liked sexually assaulting women well before he was elected. Do you expect people who dislike sexual assault to sort of put that aside for a year or so and wait to see if he does a good job as a president? I'm pretty sure if you're anti-sexual assault you're gonna hate him from the point where he brags about it forward.

He liked telling people in his crowd to attack journalists or protesters during his campaign...
On his inauguration day he started lying about crowd size... crowd size. Seriously, from day 1 of his presidency he started with childish lies and pretending the media is lying about him. (attacking the media again).

Even someone who decided to push reset on all the horrible character flaws he demonstrated in the campaign, to give him a fresh chance on election... Day one he started with mewling whiny lies about his crowd size.


victor = bandy

teedubbya Offline
#384 Posted:
Joined: 08-14-2003
Posts: 95,637
tailgater wrote:
No schit sherlock.

And the sky is blue.






I hate blue
tailgater Offline
#385 Posted:
Joined: 06-01-2000
Posts: 26,185
victor809 wrote:
Sure. Plenty of people disliked obama because he was going to screw with the healthcare system in place currently, or do other liberal things. That's not what I'm talking about.
I'm talking about the muslim references, the monkey photos/drawings, the "kenyan king" references, the birther crap, and a huge number of other things which popped up which had absolutely nothing to do with his politics, had nothing to do with a single outrageous thing he did or said prior to the election, yet immediately became a reason to attack him.

That crap had nothing to do with politics or him as a person. It was purely based on his race, his name, the fact he was "different" to people.

.


That's a load of crap.
You keep talking about monkey photos, but truth be told if not for YOU I'd never even know about them. (well, maybe some others from this board. but no where else. ever.)
Like I told Huck, OF COURSE the racists hated him for his skin color.

You seem incapable of separating that from your thought process.
Sorry to confuse you.


tailgater Offline
#386 Posted:
Joined: 06-01-2000
Posts: 26,185
teedubbya wrote:
I hate blue


Blue is the new violet.

delta1 Offline
#387 Posted:
Joined: 11-23-2011
Posts: 28,794
nooooo....Blue Lives Matter!!!
paulkeck Offline
#388 Posted:
Joined: 02-24-2013
Posts: 2,686
delta1 wrote:
nooooo....Blue Lives Matter!!!

That's hate speech
victor809 Offline
#389 Posted:
Joined: 10-14-2011
Posts: 23,866
tailgater wrote:
That's a load of crap.
You keep talking about monkey photos, but truth be told if not for YOU I'd never even know about them. (well, maybe some others from this board. but no where else. ever.)
Like I told Huck, OF COURSE the racists hated him for his skin color.

You seem incapable of separating that from your thought process.
Sorry to confuse you.




You're kidding, right?
One of the first times I got banned here was because of a photo posted to pic post of obama as a monkey or something like that. I don't even remember who posted it.... but this was right around his election or inauguration.

Back then there were posters using the n-word (I believe someone with goat in their username?)... there was a lot of really racist sh#t on this site.

Maybe you didn't see it.
Maybe you forgot about it, because it didn't impact you...
Hell... maybe you just have rose colored glasses. But it was prevalent.
teedubbya Offline
#390 Posted:
Joined: 08-14-2003
Posts: 95,637
I still think the worst was the planet of the apes michelle picture post and all the great racist crap posted with it. My understanding is Swedish Match ultimately had it pulled.
delta1 Offline
#391 Posted:
Joined: 11-23-2011
Posts: 28,794
but....orange is a race......................... right?
HuckFinn Offline
#392 Posted:
Joined: 07-10-2017
Posts: 2,044
tailgater wrote:
No schit sherlock.

And the sky is blue.




Not today it ain't
HuckFinn Offline
#393 Posted:
Joined: 07-10-2017
Posts: 2,044
tailgater wrote:
Blue is the new violet.


And orange is the new black
HuckFinn Offline
#394 Posted:
Joined: 07-10-2017
Posts: 2,044
paulkeck wrote:
But that was cute and all!! Knight in shining armor! Lol


At least you're smart enough to avoid serious conversation.
You go girl.
paulkeck Offline
#395 Posted:
Joined: 02-24-2013
Posts: 2,686
HuckFinn wrote:
At least you're smart enough to avoid serious conversation.
You go girl.

Yes Maam!! Learned a long time ago, my opinion is not gonna change...just like the other guys opinion isn't. Why waste time. You can use that if you want Princess. I won't mind
HuckFinn Offline
#396 Posted:
Joined: 07-10-2017
Posts: 2,044
paulkeck wrote:
Yes Maam!! Learned a long time ago, my opinion is not gonna change...just like the other guys opinion isn't. Why waste time. You can use that if you want Princess. I won't mind

Here's where I say 'okay sweetheart' and you answer...and i...and I waste more time on you..

You like trading barbs more than I do.
I'm more interested in hearing what people actually THINK.
I like to think I'm open minded.
And as you said, your mind is closed.

Works for you. Good.




paulkeck Offline
#397 Posted:
Joined: 02-24-2013
Posts: 2,686
HuckFinn wrote:
Here's where I say 'okay sweetheart' and you answer...and i...and I waste more time on you..

You like trading barbs more than I do.
I'm more interested in hearing what people actually THINK.
I like to think I'm open minded.
And as you said, your mind is closed.

Works for you. Good.





I would believe you....if I hadn't seen most of your posts....soooo wipe your vag, pull up your big girl panties and get back to it.
HuckFinn Offline
#398 Posted:
Joined: 07-10-2017
Posts: 2,044
paulkeck wrote:
I would believe you....if I hadn't seen most of your posts....soooo wipe your vag, pull up your big girl panties and get back to it.

Buzz off azzhole.
DrafterX Offline
#399 Posted:
Joined: 10-18-2005
Posts: 98,552
OhMyGod
dstieger Offline
#400 Posted:
Joined: 06-22-2007
Posts: 10,889
I am mildly amused that there is likely a pretty big overlap in two groups: Those who claim the current administration is a neo-facist potentially devastating threat to American Democracy....and those eager to gut the 2nd amendment, which was largely designed to allow the populace to oppose such a threat
Users browsing this topic
Guest
14 Pages«<456789101112>»