America's #1 Online Cigar Auction
first, best, biggest!

Last post 5 years ago by Mr. Jones. 994 replies replies.
20 Pages«<111213141516171819>»
Kavanaghs N.E.W. "prob-lame-ohhh"...a drunkin' stupor double teaming forced dry hump
Jump to Bottom | Previous Topic | Next Topic
Phil222 Offline
#701 Posted: Fri, Sep 28 2018, 1:06 PM EST
Joined: 10-01-2017
Posts: 1,911
opelmanta1900 wrote:
I am trying to start an internet rumor that kavs first act as judge will be to legalize rape... Hoping to make it on to snopes...

Ha!
DrafterX Offline
#702 Posted: Fri, Sep 28 2018, 1:25 PM EST
Joined: 10-18-2005
Posts: 98,552
not very believable... but if you say something like, ' rape is only prosecutable the second time.. everyone gets one rape.. if you rape twice you go to prison'... Mellow
Phil222 Offline
#703 Posted: Fri, Sep 28 2018, 1:32 PM EST
Joined: 10-01-2017
Posts: 1,911
I would suggest going with something like, "Kavanaugh says he would pardon Cosby in new Jell-O ad." It's so overt, it's covert.
opelmanta1900 Offline
#704 Posted: Fri, Sep 28 2018, 1:41 PM EST
Joined: 01-10-2012
Posts: 13,954
I was just gonna say he was planning on overturning roe vs. teamsters union 287 (gangbangers, sexual deviants, and bicycle mechanics)...
delta1 Offline
#705 Posted: Fri, Sep 28 2018, 2:03 PM EST
Joined: 11-23-2011
Posts: 28,794
seems the GOP couldn't muster enough votes on a floor vote to proceed...that's the only explanation for the one week delay...not sure if the FBI can conduct a full investigation in one week, so they'll have to mobilize a larger team and focus on key witnesses...it'd be surprising if they uncover any more "evidence" or facts, to clear Kavanaugh or to support Ford's allegations...but this was a significant concession, given the rancor among the members of the SJC...


maybe there is some hope for the Senate to restore some dignity and lend credence to its self-professed aspiration to be the deliberative body that weighs all facts before decisions are made...
DrafterX Offline
#706 Posted: Fri, Sep 28 2018, 2:17 PM EST
Joined: 10-18-2005
Posts: 98,552
I didn't think the 'investgation' was approved.. Flaky's trying to sell his vote but I'm not sure it's gonna happen.. Mellow
Speyside Offline
#707 Posted: Fri, Sep 28 2018, 2:31 PM EST
Joined: 03-16-2015
Posts: 13,106
Anthony I am talked out on this. You think this hurts the democrats, I think it hurts the republicans. No surprise there. The hurt I think we can agree on is this hurts the country. Politics has always been vicious, but this is beyond vicious. I am not even sure how to describe this. It seems like the days of having differing opinions, but still respecting the other person are gone. I find that to be a shame. I understand the game the democrats are playing, but do not like it. The republicans played a similar game with Merrik Garland and won. I didn't like that either.
delta1 Offline
#708 Posted: Fri, Sep 28 2018, 2:38 PM EST
Joined: 11-23-2011
Posts: 28,794
DrafterX wrote:
I didn't think the 'investgation' was approved.. Flaky's trying to sell his vote but I'm not sure it's gonna happen.. Mellow



so...the Senate will just revert to being partisan hacks...like I'm afraid Kavanaugh will be if he's seated ...

I'm still disappointed that the majority on the committee didn't adhere to their pre-set conditions, one that was supposed to be fair to both Ford and Kavanaugh. Their lady prosecutor went the entire way on their behalf when Ford was testifying. When it was Kavanaugh's turn in the barrel, she started off on behalf of GOP members. Kavanaugh was doing his best to answer but appeared hesitant and unsure about some details. His tone was respectful and courteous, but he seemed unsteady...

then Lindsey Graham put a stop to the supposedly fair process, which might've been probative of something if allowed to continue...but it got shot down...not fair...



Maybe the GOP majority, while trying to protect itself from looking like villains in questioning a witness, have stumbled onto a procedure that would have better results, regardless of the party in power, when hearings of this type are needed. Let an out-side non-partisan exper conduct the examination of the witnesses in an open hearing, and then let the members of the committee do follow-up questions after the testimony. This may replace the purely partisan speech making that this process is now.
victor809 Offline
#709 Posted: Fri, Sep 28 2018, 3:10 PM EST
Joined: 10-14-2011
Posts: 23,866
Opel.... Your attempted rumor makes no sense. Why would he need to legalize rape???


It is clearly already legal....

(See what I did there?)
victor809 Offline
#710 Posted: Fri, Sep 28 2018, 3:11 PM EST
Joined: 10-14-2011
Posts: 23,866
Did they delay the vote? I've been on a call....
Dammit.
opelmanta1900 Offline
#711 Posted: Fri, Sep 28 2018, 3:34 PM EST
Joined: 01-10-2012
Posts: 13,954
For one week... If he can go that long without rapin' then he's in... Pressure's on...
delta1 Offline
#712 Posted: Fri, Sep 28 2018, 3:46 PM EST
Joined: 11-23-2011
Posts: 28,794
Abrignac wrote:




boof







smells fishy in here
victor809 Offline
#713 Posted: Fri, Sep 28 2018, 3:50 PM EST
Joined: 10-14-2011
Posts: 23,866
Like a highscooler at the end of one of kavanaugh's gang rapes?
delta1 Offline
#714 Posted: Fri, Sep 28 2018, 4:02 PM EST
Joined: 11-23-2011
Posts: 28,794
One week...Kavanaugh knows what he did...if he didn't do anything...nothing to worry about...but he knows what he did...

anybody catch his tearful apology to Renate? Seemed to come from a deep dark place...he knows what he did...
DrafterX Offline
#715 Posted: Fri, Sep 28 2018, 4:14 PM EST
Joined: 10-18-2005
Posts: 98,552
So, they're going to go shake down a depressed alcholic and maybe find out he owes back taxes or somethin.. then grant him immunity to turn on 'Kavanaugh.. ya, that seems fair... Mellow
victor809 Offline
#716 Posted: Fri, Sep 28 2018, 4:26 PM EST
Joined: 10-14-2011
Posts: 23,866
Hell... I don't know what he did or didn't do.

But I know that the reps are trying to push thru a candidate who should have been dumped for one that didn't have the risk associated with them and that makes this hilarious.

Its not like he is super qualified. Hell he can't handle a little pressure without getting upset. They probably have a list of other judges who are just as qualified, but haven't been accused of sexual assaults and alcohol abuse.

The risk here is that more information might come out over the next week that would keep him from getting confirmed.

I don't know if I said it already or if that was in a post that got lost with an internet issue... But we are looking at 2 options only for SCJs...for the next 2-6 years trump will nominate "conservative" (read likely anti gay rights and anti abortion) judges to support the Evangelical azzholes... We can either get:
1- super "conservative" judges who just sit there being conservative judges

2- super "conservative" judges who we get to mock for being rapists or sexual assaulters or pedophiles or dog-fkkers....

There will not be a judge nominated who anyone other than the trump republicans likes... And that's fair. They won the election. But to pretend any of this is democratic strategery is ridiculous. They don't get to choose the next one if they find a reason to not confirm this one.

No... As far as I'm concerned the only good option here is one which will at least provide me with amusement while having to deal with a conservative judge.

victor809 Offline
#717 Posted: Fri, Sep 28 2018, 4:27 PM EST
Joined: 10-14-2011
Posts: 23,866
Drafter...
You're accusing people of a crime without any evidence and before it even happens... And you whine about how kavanaugh has been treated????
DrafterX Offline
#718 Posted: Fri, Sep 28 2018, 4:33 PM EST
Joined: 10-18-2005
Posts: 98,552
It was hypothetical.. Mellow
victor809 Offline
#719 Posted: Fri, Sep 28 2018, 4:36 PM EST
Joined: 10-14-2011
Posts: 23,866
So, drafter's going to go and rape ford's dog until she withdraws her statement....

ya, that seems fair....
DrafterX Offline
#720 Posted: Fri, Sep 28 2018, 4:38 PM EST
Joined: 10-18-2005
Posts: 98,552
No way man... Not talking
DrafterX Offline
#721 Posted: Fri, Sep 28 2018, 5:13 PM EST
Joined: 10-18-2005
Posts: 98,552
I wonder what the Resistance offered McFlaky Obstructionist anyways... Think
victor809 Offline
#722 Posted: Fri, Sep 28 2018, 5:18 PM EST
Joined: 10-14-2011
Posts: 23,866
They promised him that kavaunagh wouldn't rape him....
DrafterX Offline
#723 Posted: Fri, Sep 28 2018, 5:20 PM EST
Joined: 10-18-2005
Posts: 98,552
Well, that's somethin.. Mellow
DrafterX Offline
#724 Posted: Fri, Sep 28 2018, 5:25 PM EST
Joined: 10-18-2005
Posts: 98,552
I doubt he gets reelected... Mellow
victor809 Offline
#725 Posted: Fri, Sep 28 2018, 5:28 PM EST
Joined: 10-14-2011
Posts: 23,866
Hasn't he said he isn't running after this?
delta1 Offline
#726 Posted: Fri, Sep 28 2018, 5:29 PM EST
Joined: 11-23-2011
Posts: 28,794
it seems that something happened in a public elevator in the congressional building...this ties in with the thread about Ted Cruz being hounded out of a restaurant by people sending him a message...

in a scene captured by reporters with video cameras, Flake was getting out/in of an elevator when several women got into the elevator with him and explained they were there as victims of sexual misconduct, and urged him to do the right thing...he seemed to be visibly moved and later made his request to the Judiciary committee...

politicians need more in person contact with the people they represent...

and yes, Flake is retiring, which makes it easier for him to do this...none of the other 10 GOP senators on that committee would've even thought of doing something like that, even if they held sincere doubts about Kavanaugh...
DrafterX Offline
#727 Posted: Fri, Sep 28 2018, 5:31 PM EST
Joined: 10-18-2005
Posts: 98,552
Did they show their boobs..?? Huh
delta1 Offline
#728 Posted: Fri, Sep 28 2018, 5:33 PM EST
Joined: 11-23-2011
Posts: 28,794
their backs were to the camera, so I couldn't tell, but Flake was looking down...
DrafterX Offline
#729 Posted: Fri, Sep 28 2018, 5:33 PM EST
Joined: 10-18-2005
Posts: 98,552
What happens in da elevator stays in da elevator.. Mellow
delta1 Offline
#730 Posted: Fri, Sep 28 2018, 5:36 PM EST
Joined: 11-23-2011
Posts: 28,794
woulda been easier then if Kavanaugh did the wild thing on Ford at Georgetown Prep's campus...he has said "what happens at Georgetown Prep stays at Georgetown Prep, and that's been good for us"
DrafterX Offline
#731 Posted: Fri, Sep 28 2018, 5:40 PM EST
Joined: 10-18-2005
Posts: 98,552
I remember.. Mellow
DrafterX Offline
#732 Posted: Fri, Sep 28 2018, 6:04 PM EST
Joined: 10-18-2005
Posts: 98,552
So, what would be an acceptable judge for the Dems..?? Huh

No names, just what background and lifestyle...
opelmanta1900 Offline
#733 Posted: Fri, Sep 28 2018, 6:08 PM EST
Joined: 01-10-2012
Posts: 13,954
I bet it rhymes with willary schlinton...
DrafterX Offline
#734 Posted: Fri, Sep 28 2018, 6:10 PM EST
Joined: 10-18-2005
Posts: 98,552
Because a Christian, married with family American attorney and jurist who currently serves as a United States Circuit Judge of the United States Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit. And graduated from Yale College **** laude, with a degree in American history doesn't seem to be good enough.. Mellow
victor809 Offline
#735 Posted: Fri, Sep 28 2018, 6:47 PM EST
Joined: 10-14-2011
Posts: 23,866
Dude.... stop playing whiny victim.
The dems just confirmed a judge last year. There was no issue. No one claimed he was raping anyone.

If "doesn't have rumors of sexual assault" is too hard a criteria to meet....
delta1 Offline
#736 Posted: Fri, Sep 28 2018, 6:50 PM EST
Joined: 11-23-2011
Posts: 28,794
DrafterX wrote:
Because a Christian, married with family American attorney and jurist who currently serves as a United States Circuit Judge of the United States Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit. And graduated from Yale College **** laude, with a degree in American history doesn't seem to be good enough.. Mellow




all that would be fine...no problems with his family background, education and judicial experience...other qualifications factor into an assessment of his fitness...let's remember that no one is entitled to sit on the bench of SCOTUS...that honor is reserved for the best and brightest, a judgement made by a majority of elected Senators...many nominees throughout history have been rejected with similar legal training and experience, for a variety of reasons...

Here are some reasons why I don't support him for SCOTUS, before Ford allegations:

his experience as a law clerk for a judge who helped him climb the ladder, a judge who resigned in disgrace under a cloud of sexual misconduct, a cloud Kavanaugh incredibly claims he didn't see, a claim that all the other clerks who worked for the judge at the same time says was very clear...

his failure to release thousands of work documents created during his time working for the Bush Administration, when a controversial war was waged, amidst controversy regarding the treatment of POW's, practices which were later ruled unconstitutional ...

his legal writings that afford absolute/unitary power to the office of the President and his claim the President is immune to criminal prosecution while in office ...which happens to be a belief shared by the very President who nominated him over the objections/advice of the Senate Majority leader...

his lack of candor, credibility and evasiveness during senate confirmation hearings about a host of issues, including abortion, stolen emails...

his performance during his confirmation hearings...deer in the headlights looks when tough questions were asked...unexplained and lengthy pauses followed by non-answers...inconsistent statements about previous positions about legal matters...all led me to think he is not qualified...
DrafterX Offline
#737 Posted: Fri, Sep 28 2018, 6:55 PM EST
Joined: 10-18-2005
Posts: 98,552
Does the timing not throw any kind of flag to you..?? Why not bring this up before the 30 hours of drilling he went thru by Congress..??

Would the previous appointment given the court a majority..?? Huh

Kavanaugh has a clear history of ruling by the law without bias.. it's been the Resistance.. and the damage is done..

Celebrate it... Mellow
tailgater Offline
#738 Posted: Fri, Sep 28 2018, 6:59 PM EST
Joined: 06-01-2000
Posts: 26,185
delta1 wrote:
all that would be fine...no problems with his family background, education and judicial experience...other qualifications factor into an assessment of his fitness...let's remember that no one is entitled to sit on the bench of SCOTUS...that honor is reserved for the best and brightest, a judgement made by a majority of elected Senators...many nominees throughout history have been rejected with similar legal training and experience, for a variety of reasons...

Here are some reasons why I don't support him for SCOTUS, before Ford allegations:

his experience as a law clerk for a judge who helped him climb the ladder, a judge who resigned in disgrace under a cloud of sexual misconduct, a cloud Kavanaugh incredibly claims he didn't see, a claim that all the other clerks who worked for the judge at the same time says was very clear...

his failure to release thousands of work documents created during his time working for the Bush Administration, when a controversial war was waged, amidst controversy regarding the treatment of POW's, practices which were later ruled unconstitutional ...

his legal writings that afford absolute/unitary power to the office of the President and his claim the President is immune to criminal prosecution while in office ...which happens to be a belief shared by the very President who nominated him over the objections/advice of the Senate Majority leader...

his lack of candor, credibility and evasiveness during senate confirmation hearings about a host of issues, including abortion, stolen emails...

his performance during his confirmation hearings...deer in the headlights looks when tough questions were asked...unexplained and lengthy pauses followed by non-answers...inconsistent statements about previous positions about legal matters...all led me to think he is not qualified...


Good thing Hillary ain't nominated.
delta1 Offline
#739 Posted: Fri, Sep 28 2018, 7:07 PM EST
Joined: 11-23-2011
Posts: 28,794
DrafterX wrote:
Does the timing not throw any kind of flag to you..?? Why not bring this up before the 30 hours of drilling he went thru by Congress..??

Would the previous appointment given the court a majority..?? Huh

Kavanaugh has a clear history of ruling by the law without bias.. it's been the Resistance.. and the damage is done..

Celebrate it... Mellow




no, the timing doesn't add up to a vast left wing search and destroy mission, as Kavanaugh claims...

a claim that should make any person who goes before a SCOTUS with a Justice Kavanaugh sitting trying to advance a liberal cause, whatever the merits... he has made his contempt for any Dem very clear...
DrafterX Offline
#740 Posted: Fri, Sep 28 2018, 7:09 PM EST
Joined: 10-18-2005
Posts: 98,552
Mission accomplished then... Accuse someone of rape and let them get pissed off about it is all it takes I guess...
delta1 Offline
#741 Posted: Fri, Sep 28 2018, 7:10 PM EST
Joined: 11-23-2011
Posts: 28,794
tailgater wrote:
Good thing Hillary ain't nominated.



likely a primary reason she wasn't elected...
DrafterX Offline
#742 Posted: Fri, Sep 28 2018, 7:12 PM EST
Joined: 10-18-2005
Posts: 98,552
Career be damned.... Mellow
delta1 Offline
#743 Posted: Fri, Sep 28 2018, 7:14 PM EST
Joined: 11-23-2011
Posts: 28,794
I think if Ford had made her allegations at any step of Kavanaugh's rise and it was investigated...he wouldn't be here...
DrafterX Offline
#744 Posted: Fri, Sep 28 2018, 7:20 PM EST
Joined: 10-18-2005
Posts: 98,552
Even without proof..?? Huh
DrafterX Offline
#745 Posted: Fri, Sep 28 2018, 7:21 PM EST
Joined: 10-18-2005
Posts: 98,552
That would be setting quite a precedent... Mellow
victor809 Offline
#746 Posted: Fri, Sep 28 2018, 7:23 PM EST
Joined: 10-14-2011
Posts: 23,866
How would not nominating people with questionable background set a precedent?


... nevermind... Forgot we're talking about republicans. You're right, not promoting him because of sexual assault accusations would set a precedent.
DrafterX Offline
#747 Posted: Fri, Sep 28 2018, 7:24 PM EST
Joined: 10-18-2005
Posts: 98,552
Without proof... Mellow
Mr. Jones Offline
#748 Posted: Fri, Sep 28 2018, 7:32 PM EST
Joined: 06-12-2005
Posts: 19,425
I just received a joke text from my buddies:

Ms. FORD: "THE DRY HUMP FIRST WORLD PROBLEM TRAUMATIZED FOR LIFE LIGHTWEIGHT"
NEXT TO "Garth" ( Dana Carvey/ w- long blond hair and thick black glasses) of WAYNE & GARTH from "WAYNE'S WORLD"

Funny as all get out....

"Traumatized for life" by dry humping is WEAK.
READ MY NEW POST.
teedubbya Offline
#749 Posted: Fri, Sep 28 2018, 7:34 PM EST
Joined: 08-14-2003
Posts: 95,637
Finally an adult not digging in to either side based on the game alone. The Dems used this as an ambush and the reps wanted to slam this through without investigating or caring if he sexually assaulted someone due to their understandable anger. Not even a cursory investigation has not been done. Not even basic interviews of potential witnesses.

All I wanted was a fairly quick looksie by the fbi with interviews under oath. Then vote. If there is nothing more than we have today after the investigation confirm him. If he lied about anything can him. If anyone else lied prosecute.

Thank you Sen. Flake.
teedubbya Offline
#750 Posted: Fri, Sep 28 2018, 7:35 PM EST
Joined: 08-14-2003
Posts: 95,637
DrafterX wrote:
Without proof... Mellow



Hearing distant lock her up chants while reading this.
Users browsing this topic
Guest
20 Pages«<111213141516171819>»
Back to Top