America's #1 Online Cigar Auction
first, best, biggest!

Last post 5 years ago by Mr. Jones. 994 replies replies.
20 Pages«<8910111213141516>»
Kavanaghs N.E.W. "prob-lame-ohhh"...a drunkin' stupor double teaming forced dry hump
teedubbya Offline
#551 Posted:
Joined: 08-14-2003
Posts: 95,637
New allegations when he was in his thirties
victor809 Offline
#552 Posted:
Joined: 10-14-2011
Posts: 23,866
None. But I don't assume my life experiences are the norm.

So you never said she lied... But said you assume everyone (including her) is full of sh**..... I'm not seeing a difference. And why would you say her statement is full of sh** but not state you think kavanaugh's statement isn't full of sh** ?

Bottom line, none of us know. You appear to be choosing to believe one over the other based on reasons which don't necessarily appear to be logical.
victor809 Offline
#553 Posted:
Joined: 10-14-2011
Posts: 23,866
I'm very disappointed in my news sources that I haven't heard of this yet.
bgz Offline
#554 Posted:
Joined: 07-29-2014
Posts: 13,023
victor809 wrote:
None. But I don't assume my life experiences are the norm.

So you never said she lied... But said you assume everyone (including her) is full of sh**..... I'm not seeing a difference. And why would you say her statement is full of sh** but not state you think kavanaugh's statement isn't full of sh** ?

Bottom line, none of us know. You appear to be choosing to believe one over the other based on reasons which don't necessarily appear to be logical.


Am I choosing to believe one side or the other? Or just arguing with you because you seem so set on yours?
bgz Offline
#555 Posted:
Joined: 07-29-2014
Posts: 13,023
teedubbya wrote:
New allegations when he was in his thirties


Just read about that one. That one seems far more credible than the gang rape allegation.
victor809 Offline
#556 Posted:
Joined: 10-14-2011
Posts: 23,866
I have said time and time again that I don't think we know who is telling the truth. If you think otherwise your reading comprehension is very poor.
victor809 Offline
#557 Posted:
Joined: 10-14-2011
Posts: 23,866
Is this the anonymous statement which apparently the senators went over on Tuesday? ....

So they read about this complaint and thought, wow.... We better confirm this guy quick?
bgz Offline
#558 Posted:
Joined: 07-29-2014
Posts: 13,023
victor809 wrote:
I have said time and time again that I don't think we know who is telling the truth. If you think otherwise your reading comprehension is very poor.


Ok mr. Judge McRapey. What ever you say.
victor809 Offline
#559 Posted:
Joined: 10-14-2011
Posts: 23,866
Hey... Just because I'm looking forward to that doesn't mean I think we're there yet.

It's the anticipation....
delta1 Offline
#560 Posted:
Joined: 11-23-2011
Posts: 28,819
GOP may have brought about a pink wave by their calculated and dismissive handling of the Kavanaugh accusers...there were a lot of women candidates being backed by women voters before, but now...

tomorrow's hearing, where the GOP members of the Senate Judiciary Committee will sit quietly by while their female hired gun queries Ford for a very short time will expose the lack of backbone by the group of old white guys...it will be as plain as the accusatory looks on the GOP senator's faces while the lady prosecutor asks the questions they don't have the balls to ask, that there is no interest on their parts in fact finding or getting to the truth...

Hard to square this rush to judgement by the law and order party and the way the hearing will look to independent voters, because McConnell has proven to be a master politician...maybe this is the GOP plan based on his read of the political landscape...he's thinking our best hope is to get Kavanaugh confirmed because we may not keep the House and/or the Senate, and with it any possibility of getting another judge confirmed...
victor809 Offline
#561 Posted:
Joined: 10-14-2011
Posts: 23,866
Another accusation in 1985 in Newport RI... On a boat.
The transcript is hilarious...
"Were you ever on a boat in Newport"....

This one should be easily verified, as the accuser says he beat the two guys up after finding out they assaulted his friend.

This one seems questionable... Mainly because the accuser only knew of the two guys as "Brett" and "Mark"... He only claims that it's kavanaugh because he saw the yearbook photo in the news recently. This isn't someone who travelled in their social circles or could have any reason to accurately identify them... After all these years it's a bit unlikely that he would recognize them from a yearbook photo....
delta1 Offline
#562 Posted:
Joined: 11-23-2011
Posts: 28,819
Opie!!! whadja do with victor????
teedubbya Offline
#563 Posted:
Joined: 08-14-2003
Posts: 95,637
I heard he held him down and tried to penetrate him.
frankj1 Offline
#564 Posted:
Joined: 02-08-2007
Posts: 44,235
saved by the Speedo
victor809 Offline
#565 Posted:
Joined: 10-14-2011
Posts: 23,866
"penetrate" is too nonspecific a word so it must not have happened.

Unless you are describing exactly what body part is going in what body part it's just an opinion as to whether or not I'm getting penetrated....
DrafterX Offline
#566 Posted:
Joined: 10-18-2005
Posts: 98,571
I'm sure you've been penetrated pretty much everywhere... Mellow
victor809 Offline
#567 Posted:
Joined: 10-14-2011
Posts: 23,866
Not true... I never partied with kavanaugh!
frankj1 Offline
#568 Posted:
Joined: 02-08-2007
Posts: 44,235
so not in Maryland?
victor809 Offline
#569 Posted:
Joined: 10-14-2011
Posts: 23,866
Hah!
teedubbya Offline
#570 Posted:
Joined: 08-14-2003
Posts: 95,637
You were in dc about the same time
victor809 Offline
#571 Posted:
Joined: 10-14-2011
Posts: 23,866
I was in MD and DC possibly overlapping with kavanaugh (mid 90s and late 2000s.... So I really should check to make sure he didn't sexually assault me.
teedubbya Offline
#572 Posted:
Joined: 08-14-2003
Posts: 95,637
No need to investigate
victor809 Offline
#573 Posted:
Joined: 10-14-2011
Posts: 23,866
Prolly not... I'm sure I saw him penetrate someone else... So it's my own fault for staying in that city.
bgz Offline
#574 Posted:
Joined: 07-29-2014
Posts: 13,023
You could be a star right now if you remembered to take pictures.
victor809 Offline
#575 Posted:
Joined: 10-14-2011
Posts: 23,866
I dunno man... If i took pictures I'm sure someone would say that meant I was consenting to it....
DrafterX Offline
#576 Posted:
Joined: 10-18-2005
Posts: 98,571
I heard he was recently in some bath house in san Francisco.. Mellow
DrafterX Offline
#577 Posted:
Joined: 10-18-2005
Posts: 98,571
In an interview with Senate Judiciary Committee investigators on Tuesday, Supreme Court nominee Brett Kavanaugh lit into the mounting sexual misconduct allegations against him, calling the litany of uncorroborated claims a "disgrace" that is "doing damage to the country."

Interesting.. I didn't think there was an investigation going on... Think
teedubbya Offline
#578 Posted:
Joined: 08-14-2003
Posts: 95,637
There isn’t. Interviewing him isn’t an investigation but you know that.

I’m surprised you like him so much knowing he cut off CROS’ legs just so he could rape him.
DrafterX Offline
#579 Posted:
Joined: 10-18-2005
Posts: 98,571
That Bassard..!! Mad
DrafterX Offline
#580 Posted:
Joined: 10-18-2005
Posts: 98,571
Ya, investigators, instigators.. pretty much the same thing.. Mellow
teedubbya Offline
#581 Posted:
Joined: 08-14-2003
Posts: 95,637
Ok
frankj1 Offline
#582 Posted:
Joined: 02-08-2007
Posts: 44,235
teedubbya wrote:
There isn’t. Interviewing him isn’t an investigation but you know that.

I’m surprised you like him so much knowing he cut off CROS’ legs just so he could rape him.

perhaps fuzzy might be able to serve his/her/its country at this time of uncertainty? He has been shacking up in your hut for a while and is probably energized.

I'd like to post a poem, hand written to me by our own C-Bid Poet Laureate, ZRX, when he sent fuzz east across the country to live with my family.

We hosted fuzzy while he attended one of the most exclusive prep(h) school in the country with other juvenile members of the ruling class families. The poem goes something like this:

Fuzzy's time with me has come and passed.

He can be quite fun, or a pain in the ass.

Staying put or out and about, he never cares, complains, or pouts.

Butt if you ask him what he likes...

It's in and out both day and night.

ZRX1200

delta1 Offline
#583 Posted:
Joined: 11-23-2011
Posts: 28,819
Crying

Big Hug
Abrignac Offline
#584 Posted:
Joined: 02-24-2012
Posts: 17,351
There should not be an investigation.

To do so starts us down yet another rabbit hole. It will prove nearly impossible to seat another justice in the future. Why, because if this stall succeeds it will only pave the way for more stalls. Blame the biddy from California for sitting on this.
Krazeehorse Offline
#585 Posted:
Joined: 04-09-2010
Posts: 1,958
America's new mantra, Guilty until proven innocent.
DrafterX Offline
#586 Posted:
Joined: 10-18-2005
Posts: 98,571
That depends on who is being accused... Mellow
DrafterX Offline
#587 Posted:
Joined: 10-18-2005
Posts: 98,571
Call out the instigators...
Because there's something in the air... Whistle
teedubbya Offline
#588 Posted:
Joined: 08-14-2003
Posts: 95,637
Just investigate. It doesn’t take long, it’s not a criminal investigation. It’s what was done before and should be done again. To confirm someone without doing so because a false claim of the future is just a manufactured excuse. Why would you want this guy if any of this is true.

We just had a guy confirmed recently without any of this suggesting this all might just be specific to this guy.
teedubbya Offline
#589 Posted:
Joined: 08-14-2003
Posts: 95,637
Krazeehorse wrote:
America's new mantra, Guilty until proven innocent.


More like don’t investigate the women are lying and we want our guy in. Although this mantra isn’t new.

By the way it’s not a criminal case.
DrafterX Offline
#590 Posted:
Joined: 10-18-2005
Posts: 98,571
I heard it's a witch hunt.. Mellow
teedubbya Offline
#591 Posted:
Joined: 08-14-2003
Posts: 95,637
No that’s mueller thing.

An investigation is not a presumption of guilt. It can actually clear. This would only be a few days fact finding investigation to provide a base for questions not draw conclusion of guilt or innocence. It identifies and talks to multiple involved parties. . It’s standard and routine. It’s odd we are pretending it’s not. It’s the norm.

And if all the info is put on the table (not just asking him and her) and it’s clear she is bunk act accordingly. That will discourage it in the future. This is a farce so far. We don’t need any other witness examination. That will jus encourage future complaints. Weird.
teedubbya Offline
#592 Posted:
Joined: 08-14-2003
Posts: 95,637
By the way we will and should get a right leaning justice. That’s the presidents prerogative and should be. Regardless of party. I’d guess we’ll get one further to the right.

I don’t get why anyone is digging in for this guy to the extent they will shelve the norm of an investigation for context prior to questioning.
dstieger Offline
#593 Posted:
Joined: 06-22-2007
Posts: 10,889
What are the #IBELIEVEIT hashtaggers saying about the two guys who said they're the ones who 'assaulted' Ford?
DrafterX Offline
#594 Posted:
Joined: 10-18-2005
Posts: 98,571
They don't want those guys investigated... Mellow
dstieger Offline
#595 Posted:
Joined: 06-22-2007
Posts: 10,889
Unsure if there's any relevance, but I have two nagging questions that I don't see much discussion about in the news..

1. Who leaked the Ford assault? I still don't fault Feinstein for keeping a close hold since that's what Ford requested....but who leaked the damn thing?

2. Why did she take that polygraph on Aug 7? I know that nobody seems to be relying on that test (good thing), but I'm curious why, if she was still anonymous and didn't plan for it be public....why the polygraph?
DrafterX Offline
#596 Posted:
Joined: 10-18-2005
Posts: 98,571
The investigators prolly insisted.. Mellow
teedubbya Offline
#597 Posted:
Joined: 08-14-2003
Posts: 95,637
DrafterX wrote:
They don't want those guys investigated... Mellow



investigate it means everything including them

fact finding not prejudged crap.
opelmanta1900 Offline
#598 Posted:
Joined: 01-10-2012
Posts: 13,954
teedubbya wrote:

I don’t get why anyone is digging in for this guy to the extent they will shelve the norm of an investigation for context prior to questioning.

Pretty sure you're not retarded, so I'm pretty sure you definitely get it...

Dems will bring up person after person after person to say something bad about kav and any other conservative white nominee put forward and demand investigation after investigation... The only - only - reason this is being done is the long term goal of preventing trump from seating another conservative justice on the supreme court...

Cons won't risk that happening, so they'll push kav through...

To pretend like any politician on either side of the aisle is doing anything out of a sense of moral duty is retarded... We all know why this is happening... Stop with the act...
teedubbya Offline
#599 Posted:
Joined: 08-14-2003
Posts: 95,637
I do get the politicians.... not normal folks like us
DrafterX Offline
#600 Posted:
Joined: 10-18-2005
Posts: 98,571
Then why did you slander all over CROS..?? Not talking
Users browsing this topic
Guest
20 Pages«<8910111213141516>»